In the effort to walk the walk, I'm blogging along with my students. This week my blogging is mostly inspired by your writing (and my own foibles). The process of doing this (not to surprisingly) felt useful and not like a time-suck as I'd feared before I began. Hopefully you find yourself wrapped up in the opportunity to reflect as well.
Reading over the blogs I am really enjoying the variety of
interpretations of the genre. I am
really enjoying the titles and various formats people are using. Some people
are really well versed in imbedding text or using images and other content to
build on their ideas (for example the horse jumping over a fence). These things
are beyond me in terms of making it happen, but as a reader the seamless
inclusion of multimedia text increases both the pleasure and often the
effectiveness of communication. Most of my favorite blogs use this
juxtaposition of text with images to make points and to get a laugh.
Dan said in his blog that students in this program not
treated as having knowledge. This is a very fair critique and one I hope to
address in this class. This results in a class in which the majority of the use
of time is on you – your language will fill the space, your ideas, your prior
knowledge, your understanding of the texts. The fact is you are experts –
experts at being a student, and scholars of what it mans to be a teacher. Pay
attention to how it feels, as a student, to be considered knowledgeable. Does
it feel like more or less work? More or less rewarding? Or am I in fact
dominating after all, not making space for the development of new knowledges. A
number of you made reference to walking the walk, and I took notice. Your
discussions lead me to realize, for example, that I need to write my own blog.
As this short term progressive, we will see how successful I am in walking the
talk of my own pedagogies.
I was very interested in Katie’s idea of considering the
possibilities for encouraging students to imagine the administration as an
audience for their work. I am very excited about this idea – it is very
radical! I’m wondering about the considerations teachers must make if they wish
to be critical, to teach their students to be critics of power and to be
activists themselves. What if the students all did really decide to rise up in
some way – and you were the instigator? This is exciting and something to
really ponder.
I found an article about this possibility, Developing an Activist Writing Program: Possibilities and Challenges
I also noticed that a lot of you liked and agreed with the
more free-choice approach to choosing a topic. Yet a lot of you struggled with
being given this choice yourself. Open ended assignments can produce anxiety
(which can certainly be complicated by unclear instructions – but in a way open
ended assignments are deliberately unclear). If you think about how this
assignment felt to you, how can you use that feeling to improve your
development of similar assignments? Another take on this question of choosing
your own topic comes from my days of teaching at an Alternative School. Many of
my students tole me they didn’t want to give me what they cared about. Why
don’t you write about skateboarding I’d say. Because it’s not FOR you they’d
say. They didn’t want what they loved to be colonized by the teacher, though
they didn’t use this language. They would rather write about what I wanted to
read. I saw this most vividly with a student who kept a notebook with him
always and wrote poetry and fiction, for his own purposes but would never let
me see it. It was gang-related writing – but not what one might think. It was
about family, mentorship, support, safety, love etc. (He did let me see it once
but not even hold it – not read whole pieces – certainly not grade it) It made
me think of Elizabeth Ellsworth's Why doesn't this feel empowering?
Along these lines, what are the risks of inviting out-of-school genre’s into the classroom (hip hop?). What does it mean to teach students through hip hop vs having them teach each other AND the teacher. I think of the times I’ve tried to teach using rap – always a HUGE flop. Even though I am a consumer of rap I am not truly “of” rap is an appropriation – if perhaps a less violent one. But while I can consume it I cannot truly teach it.
Along these lines, what are the risks of inviting out-of-school genre’s into the classroom (hip hop?). What does it mean to teach students through hip hop vs having them teach each other AND the teacher. I think of the times I’ve tried to teach using rap – always a HUGE flop. Even though I am a consumer of rap I am not truly “of” rap is an appropriation – if perhaps a less violent one. But while I can consume it I cannot truly teach it.
I am rather struck by the anecdote you laid out about your student not wanting to read something about "skateboarding", because it is "not for you." First off, props to the student for having his own ideas of audience. Even if it feels a bit off putting, it is good to see him thinking on a greater scale for his writing. The other distinction/ point being made in this story is that classic "teacher/student" dichotomy that seems to permeate every conversation on pedagogy. Was there a way for you to be able to break down the barrier between the student and yourself in this instance? If I were to get in that position, I would do two things: A) be really excited about reading a story like that from him and B) offer to share something personal, in writing, to him if he were to do the skateboarding write. I feel like composition instruction is an excellent place for student/teacher relationships to be formed beyond typical power structures, especially since writing is an extremely personal practice.
ReplyDelete